It�s that time of year again, when high school and
college students will be heading back to school. Parents devote much in
saving for their children�s college education. Many college students
will spend time working to help pay for tuition and other expenses. Both
parent and student want the best possible education. Will they get their
money�s worth? I�ve spent over two decades working as a professor, and
my answer leans towards the negative.
Choosing a college is dependent upon a number of
factors. Foremost is the student�s ability to meet the college�s
academic requirements. Also relevant is a matrix of other elements ranging
from geographic location to program of studies. Parents want their child
to enter a college with the best reputation, within the family�s
financial means. We read about university rankings and historical
reputation. We hear that a certain university has a Nobel Prize winner,
past governor, senator, or other leaders on the faculty. These factors may
influence many students in their college-selection process.
After meeting the necessary enrollment requirements
and being selected, what will the student really get? I can assure you
that the freshman undergraduate will never have the famous professor as a
teacher. Even most doctoral students won�t have an opportunity to be
taught by the big-time professors. In many cases, your hard-earned money
will go toward purchasing time in overloaded classes with beginning
professors or adjuncts. Seldom will freshmen see full professors or other
higher-ranked faculty. Most of these faculty �stars� will center the
majority of their efforts on research, writings, and doctoral
dissertations. In my view, teaching is secondary to the whole college
experience.
Observe the university advertisements aired on
television during the upcoming fall football season. They�ll emphasize
the same three elements � university teaching, research, and service. In
my opinion, teaching should be the most important element, but in most
cases it is secondary to the other two elements. Certainly research and
writing take prominence over teaching. When I first entered the college
ranks I was charged with developing a new teacher-preparation program in
technical education. It didn�t take me long to realize that long-term
survival (tenure) depended more upon my ability to write, conduct research
and obtain financial grants than it did on teaching excellence. Teaching
is important but �publish or perish� is still what university life is
all about. Obtaining funded grants is also high on the list. I was told by
one administrator that he didn�t care if I taught any classes as long as
I brought in grant money. I think it�s time for parents and students to
seek more balance between the three elements. If anything, more weight in
the tenure process should be placed on teaching excellence.
Does anyone believe that students learn best in an
auditorium with over 100 students listening to a professor speak at a
microphone? Teaching, in my
opinion, is all about human interaction. The smaller classes provide the
possibility for more human interaction. Distance learning and computers
have their place in education, but not as a substitute for the classroom
environment. The best education comes when both student and teacher are
challenged on a one-to-one basis. Universities will provide fewer of these
small interactive classes as financial pressures continue to mount. I
think freshmen should have the smallest classes. This could help with
student-retention rates. The public school environment has a similar need,
to place the more needy students with the best teachers.
Usually what happens is the opposite � we find the best teachers
wanting to teach the gifted and talented students. The rewards system at
both educational levels needs to be changed. More emphasis should be
placed on teaching those who have the greatest need. The measuring system
determines where educators will place their efforts. It doesn�t make
much difference if the standard of measure is passing SOL tests or
attaining tenure. You gravitate toward that which gets you the most
reward.
Every university wants to be ranked number one, but
let�s be practical � most students couldn�t meet the requirements of
the Harvards, Yales, Dukes, or other universities at the top of the totem
pole. The majority of students will go to other colleges and many will
still excel in the real world. I�ve
used this idea in several talks on education � If every student had 1600
SATs and got all A�s, then who would take out the garbage? You got it,
some person with a stellar academic r�sum�, because garbage removal is
an absolute necessity. Without garbage removal, the rats would be the
ultimate winners.
I�ve seen many professors with numerous published
works who couldn�t teach. On the other end of the spectrum are those who
are excellent teachers but don�t enjoy writing or doing research.
Articles in general publications such as Cooperative Living receive little
recognition. Write an article for some obscure publication in a specific
educational field based on any research and you�ll receive all kinds of
accolades. Most of these articles are read by the same small group of
people and in my opinion do little to promote educational change. I prefer
talking with you and reading your responses to my thoughts. I�ve
certainly learned as much, if not more, from this exercise as I did
conducting formal research and writing to colleagues in my chosen
profession. Balance is the key.
It�s time for those responsible for university
teaching to put more emphasis on and rewards for the teaching element of
university life. Higher education councils in the last decade have tried
to place more emphasis on teaching, but I don�t think their efforts have
paid dividends. Excellence in teaching is what I wanted for my children at
all levels of their educational experience. The university professor
should be a role model for teaching excellence. Research and writing
should be a part of good teaching, but in too many cases they end up being
the tail wagging the dog.
What�s
Your View? Obviously,
there are at least two sides to every issue. Do you have a different
view? This column is meant to provoke thought, so keep sending
comments. Each one is read with the utmost interest. Send e-mail to: [email protected],
or send written responses to the editor. Mail will be forwarded
to the author. |
|