It's
the Economy, Stupid
by Dr. John E.
Bonfadini, Ed.D., Professor Emeritus, George Mason University
John Bonfadini
|
Last year in February, I wrote an
article titled, �Selecting the 44th President,� in which I noted that
the field of presidential candidates was more diverse than ever.
I thought there was an outside
possibility that a woman could be nominated and elected president. The
probability of electing an African-American president was more than a long
shot. There were so many historical obstacles to overcome, but I learned a
quick lesson about presidential politics. The economy trumps everything.
In last year�s article, I wrote,
�Voters will use a combination of reasons for choosing one candidate over
another, ranging from party to personality. I believe the number-one item on
most voters� minds is how the next president�s platform is going to
affect their pocketbooks. Social issues are important, but I think they�re
a distant second to economics.� It was the economy that made voters look
beyond historical prejudice and pull the lever for Barack Obama. February is
Black History Month, and it�s also the month in which we celebrate
Presidents Day, a fitting time to discuss the changing political environment
in America.
Americans won�t elect anyone who
isn�t qualified to the presidency. George Orwell wrote in his book, Animal
Farm, �All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than
others.� The majority of American voters think that President Obama is
�more equal� than the rest of us. It is important that everyone be
treated equally, regardless of race, color, gender or religion. In the
context of the presidency, the phrase, �More equal than others,� means
possessing the knowledge, leadership ability, communication skills,
integrity and other characteristics that have relevance to the
individual�s ability to carry out the duties of the office. Jan. 20 was a
proud day for African-Americans; but I think it was equally as proud a day
for voters of all races who overcame decades of prejudice to vote on the
issue that really counts: Who is best prepared to carry out the duties of
the most difficult job in the land?
No one can predict the outcome of the
Obama presidency. Some presidents have not lived up to voters�
expectations. It takes years after a president leaves office for a somewhat
objective and intellectual analysis of that president�s term to emerge. I
have this uneasy feeling that, too often, many voters would like the
candidate of the �other party� to fail. Sadly, there are individuals in
all political parties who will never support an elected member of an
opposition party. That leaves the decision-making power to the few
individuals in the middle, whose fluid minds allow them the latitude to
adjust their thinking on a wide range of issues. We need more of these
voters.
A strong economy is something that
everyone wants � good jobs, money in the bank, a rising stock market, low
taxes, and good retirement plans. But different people have different ideas
on how we can achieve these things. In recent decades, we have fallen for
the quick-buck philosophy. Just a few years ago, I had neighbors tell me how
much their homes were worth � far more than I would be willing to pay.
Many bought homes based on qualification, rather than what they could
afford. They thought the value of their homes would always go up. Why
wouldn�t they? Every financial advisor or real estate agent was promoting
the idea. Buy-sell makes money. I�ve always asked the question, �What
did the resale produce?� Selling the same house with no major improvements
is similar to a company selling stock after producing nothing other than the
stock paper. The new president is going to face a real challenge in getting
people to accept working harder for less. Our kids have never been taught to
value work. They are products of our teachings, and I don't mean the
public-education system. If the company whose slogan implied, �We earn it
the old-fashioned way,� had followed their own advice, they still might be
here today.
The new president (as well as many other
politicians) has noted that education is the key to a good economy. This
amuses me. Education is a good talking point, but seldom do politicians
invest sufficient time and financial resources to make significant
differences. As the economy tanks, schools� class sizes will increase,
fewer computers will be purchased, and teachers� salaries will be frozen.
Merit-pay philosophy as a fix for problems in education will just have to
wait. I predict that test scores will remain stagnant. Education is like an
underpowered battleship that moves more because of ocean currents than
because of the power produced by its engines. We let the tides of the times
keep changing the location of the ship, when the ship needs a new
nuclear-powered engine. We design new testing schemes to determine the
ship�s location, and we continue to see that it�s moving in a circle. I
hope President Obama can right the ship�s course so it will finally begin
to sail straight and true towards port.
Vocational education is also celebrated
during the month of February. Maybe it�s time to think about what our kids
will be producing, rather than where they are going to get more education.
Recently, radio host Ric Edelman gave a caller the following advice: Be sure
you�re sufficiently funding your retirement account before you attempt to
fund your children�s college education. The economic downturn brings out
the truth. If parents aren�t going to fund the future education of their
children, then who is? If I recall correctly, the government recently spent
$700 billion or more in a �bailout.� Perhaps some of those dollars
should have been put into a future-education fund; after all, as stated,
education is the key to a strong economy.
My friend Dave, a CPA, said, �The
government should have written a check for $60,000 to every tax-paying
person in the country and let them spend it as they see fit.� I thought he
was a little �off,� but his idea is beginning to look better every day
as I search for the original stimulus-package money. By the time this
article is published, the president will have a new stimulus package to help
the economy get back on track. Stimulus or no stimulus, what we need is a
greater commitment to do a day�s work for a day�s wages. We taught our
Harvard and Yale graduates to design financial fantasies that take
workers� hard-earned dollars and cause them to evaporate into Harry Potter
land. It�s time to teach them the value of hard work. If our educational
system is the key to the economy, then it needs to change by requiring that
we earn rewards the old-fashioned way, with hard work that produces
something tangible.
The election of President Obama has
removed another of our nation�s social barriers and gives credence to the
idea, �Work hard and one day you, too, can become president.� The new
president�s speeches have centered on hope for the future. It�s good to
have hope, but hope is of little value if it doesn�t unlock the ideas of
the human mind that can be shared with other minds of a society. We hope his
ideas will produce a better life that goes beyond fixing the economy and
deals with the many complexities of life in an ever-changing world.
Good luck, Mr. President.